You run enough moving parts to feel the gaps.
Multiple active jobs, crews, subcontractors, customers, vehicles, equipment, schedule changes, and field communication create real coordination pressure.
Founding design partner program
We are selecting a small number of GCs willing to bring real projects, real failure stories, and direct feedback into the product process.
Design partners work directly with the people building Duxor. The goal is to solve repeatable contractor problems, validate the live operating model, and shape a product that can replace fragmented daily workflows.
What you receive
This is not a survey panel. Founding design partners participate in a practical build and pilot process.
Who fits best
The strongest design partners are candid, specific, willing to use real workflows, and interested in solving problems that other contractors share.
Multiple active jobs, crews, subcontractors, customers, vehicles, equipment, schedule changes, and field communication create real coordination pressure.
You use several products, spreadsheets, group texts, email, accounting tools, cameras, or manual processes and can explain where the handoffs break.
You remember the late crew, missed handoff, buried customer decision, wrong-site tool, schedule surprise, or morning spent calling everyone for status.
You can involve an owner or operations lead, a project manager, a superintendent, and a small field team in a controlled rollout.
How it works
We start narrow enough to learn quickly, then expand only after the core experience proves useful and reliable.
Review the tools, spreadsheets, texts, devices, reports, costs, and manual processes used to run the company.
Identify missing information, delayed communication, duplicate entry, unnecessary calls, and the action the system should have enabled.
Load representative people, projects, jobsites, schedules, vehicles, equipment, customer contacts, and financial context.
Run active work through Duxor, review feedback frequently, distinguish universal needs from company preferences, and ship improvements.
The standard we care about
The best outcome is not a long list of requested features. It is fewer status calls, less duplicate entry, faster schedule changes, better communication capture, earlier warning, and one trusted place to act.
We will ask hard questions. Which information was unavailable? Who needed it? When did it become important? What downstream work did it affect? What should have happened automatically, and what should have required confirmation?
That is how a broad platform stays useful instead of becoming a collection of checkboxes.
Common questions
We are intentionally limiting the early program so each partner receives meaningful attention.
No. The pilot should begin with a focused workflow and controlled group. We will identify where Duxor can replace, reduce, or connect existing tools as value is proven.
No. We need an engaged operating lead, access to a few representative users, and the willingness to explain current processes honestly.
No. Requests are evaluated as universal, segment-specific, configurable, integration-driven, or company-specific. The goal is a strong product, not custom software for one company.
Pilot structure and pricing depend on scope, onboarding effort, users, data, and timing. Founding partners receive preferred terms and direct product influence.
The more specific the story, the better the first conversation.